Optimalisasi Sistem Informasi Geografis dalam Mendukung Operasi Militer Selain Perang pada Wilayah Maritim Kota Semarang: Studi Kasus Bantuan Bencana, SAR, dan Pengamanan Jalur Pelayaran
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Wilayah maritim Kota Semarang menghadapi berbagai ancaman non-tradisional dan bencana geohidrologis yang terus meningkat, mulai dari banjir rob, penurunan muka tanah (land subsidence), hingga kepadatan lalu lintas kapal di jalur pelayaran strategis menuju Pelabuhan Tanjung Emas. Kondisi ini menuntut kesiapan Operasi Militer Selain Perang (OMSP) yang responsif dan berbasis data spasial yang akurat. Tulisan ini bertujuan menganalisis peran Sistem Informasi Geografis (SIG) dalam mendukung empat domain OMSP di wilayah maritim Semarang, yaitu bantuan kemanusiaan dan penanggulangan bencana, pencarian dan pertolongan (SAR), pengawasan jalur pelayaran strategis, serta pengamanan sumber daya kelautan. Penelitian menggunakan metode tinjauan literatur (literature review) dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif-analitis, menyintesis temuan dari kajian mengenai remote sensing, marine spatial planning, geospatial intelligence, serta integrasi SIG dengan Automatic Identification System (AIS), citra satelit, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), dan machine learning. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa SIG memberikan kontribusi signifikan dalam mempercepat proses pengambilan keputusan, meningkatkan akurasi pemetaan area terdampak bencana, mengoptimalkan jalur evakuasi dan pencarian korban, serta memperkuat pengawasan terhadap aktivitas ilegal di laut. Namun demikian, efektivitas implementasi SIG masih dibatasi oleh keterbatasan integrasi data lintas instansi, ketersediaan infrastruktur, dan kapasitas sumber daya manusia operator sistem. Tulisan ini merekomendasikan penguatan interoperabilitas data spasial antara TNI, BNPB, BASARNAS, dan otoritas pelabuhan sebagai langkah strategis untuk mengoptimalkan OMSP berbasis SIG di wilayah maritim Indonesia, khususnya pada kota pesisir yang rentan seperti Semarang.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Díaz, H., & Soares, C. (2021). A multi-criteria approach to evaluate floating offshore wind farms siting in the Canary Islands (Spain). Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14040865
Dritsas, E., & Trigka, M. (2025). Remote sensing and geospatial analysis in the big data era: A survey. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030550
Flannery, W., Healy, N., & Luna, M. (2018). Exclusion and non-participation in Marine Spatial Planning. Marine Policy, 88, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.001
Gimpel, A., Stelzenmüller, V., Töpsch, S., Galparsoro, I., Gubbins, M., Miller, D., Murillas, A., Murray, A., Pınarbaşı, K., Roca, G., & Watret, R. (2018). A GIS-based tool for an integrated assessment of spatial planning trade-offs with aquaculture. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.133
Hammar, L., Molander, S., Pålsson, J., Crona, J. S., Carneiro, G., Johansson, T., Hume, D., Kågesten, G., Mattsson, D., Törnqvist, O., Zillén, L., Mattsson, M., Bergström, U., Perry, D., Caldow, C., & Andersen, J. (2020). Cumulative impact assessment for ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Science of the Total Environment, 734, 139024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139024
Jones, P. J. S., Lieberknecht, L., & Qiu, W. (2016). Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Marine Policy, 71, 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.026
Lester, S. E., Stevens, J., Gentry, R., Kappel, C., Bell, T. W., Costello, C., Gaines, S., Kiefer, D. A., Maue, C., Rensel, J., Simons, R., Washburn, L., & White, C. (2018). Marine spatial planning makes room for offshore aquaculture in crowded coastal waters. Nature Communications, 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03249-1
Li, X., Liu, B., Zheng, G., Ren, Y., Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Gao, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, B., & Wang, F. (2020). Deep-learning-based information mining from ocean remote-sensing imagery. National Science Review, 7, 1584–1605. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa047
Lü, G., Batty, M., Strobl, J., Lin, H., Zhu, A., & Chen, M. (2018). Reflections and speculations on the progress in Geographic Information Systems (GIS): A geographic perspective. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33, 346–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1533136
Mahrad, B. E., Newton, A., Icely, J., Kacimi, I., Abalansa, S., & Snoussi, M. (2020). Contribution of remote sensing technologies to a holistic coastal and marine environmental management framework: A review. Remote Sensing, 12, 2313. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142313
McIntire, A., Calvert, I., & Ashcraft, J. (2024). Pressure to Plagiarize and the Choice to Cheat: Toward a Pragmatic Reframing of the Ethics of Academic Integrity. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030244
Melet, A., Teatini, P., Cozannet, G., Jamet, C., Conversi, A., Benveniste, J., & Almar, R. (2020). Earth observations for monitoring marine coastal hazards and their drivers. Surveys in Geophysics, 41, 1489–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09594-5
Quamar, M. I., Al-Ramadan, B., Khan, K. A., Shafiullah, M., & El-Ferik, S. (2023). Advancements and applications of drone-integrated Geographic Information System technology: A review. Remote Sensing, 15, 5039. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15205039
Shi, Z. (2020). A spatial-temporal attention-based method and a new dataset for remote sensing image change detection. Remote Sensing, 12, 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101662
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Turner, I. L., Harley, M. D., Almar, R., & Bergsma, E. (2021). Satellite optical imagery in coastal engineering. Coastal Engineering, 167, 103919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.103919
Vitousek, S., Buscombe, D., Vos, K., Barnard, P., Ritchie, A. C., & Warrick, J. A. (2022). The future of coastal monitoring through satellite remote sensing. Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures. https://doi.org/10.1017/cft.2022.4
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39, 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yang, Y., Shao, Z., Hu, Y., Mei, Q., Pan, J., Song, R., & Wang, P. (2022). Geographical spatial analysis and risk prediction based on machine learning for maritime traffic accidents: A case study of Fujian sea area. Ocean Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113106
Yastika, P. E., Shimizu, N., & Abidin, H. Z. (2019). Monitoring of long-term land subsidence from 2003 to 2017 in coastal area of Semarang, Indonesia by SBAS DInSAR analyses using Envisat-ASAR, ALOS-PALSAR, and Sentinel-1A SAR data. Advances in Space Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.11.008
Zhang, B., Wu, Y., Zhao, B., Chanussot, J., Hong, D., Yao, J., & Gao, L. (2022). Progress and challenges in intelligent remote sensing satellite systems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 15, 1814–1822. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2022.3148139
Zheng, Z., Zhong, Y., Wang, J., Ailong, & Zhang, L. (2023). FarSeg++: Foreground-aware relation network for geospatial object segmentation in high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45, 13715–13729. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2023.3296757
Zhu, Q., Guo, X., Li, Z., & Li, D. (2022). A review of multi-class change detection for satellite remote sensing imagery. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 27, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2022.2128902
Undang-Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 tentang Tentara Nasional Indonesia.